[VOTE] Apache Cayenne release 3.0B1 - take 2

[Andrus Adamchik]

Just posted fresh artifacts:

http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0B1/

Please cast your votes.

Thanks,
Andrus

[Andrus Adamchik]

Guys, I know it may be too much trouble to evaluate two releases in a  
row, but can we take a look at the new artifacts please?

Thanks,
Andrus

P.S. Here is my +1



On Nov 3, 2009, at 10:17 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

> Just posted fresh artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0B1/
>
> Please cast your votes.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrus
>

[Aristedes Maniatis-2]

When I take an MD5 hash of the client and server jars, I find that nothing at all changed between the previous beta and this beta. If that is expected, then I'm +1. I did some testing of the Modeler and didn't find any issues.

Ari


On 6/11/09 6:57 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

> Guys, I know it may be too much trouble to evaluate two releases in a
> row, but can we take a look at the new artifacts please?
>
> Thanks,
> Andrus
>
> P.S. Here is my +1
>
>
>
> On Nov 3, 2009, at 10:17 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>> Just posted fresh artifacts:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0B1/
>>
>> Please cast your votes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andrus
>>
>

--

-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

[Andrus Adamchik]

On Nov 6, 2009, at 10:15 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:

> When I take an MD5 hash of the client and server jars, I find that  
> nothing at all changed between the previous beta and this beta. If  
> that is expected, then I'm +1

No, MD5s should not match the first round of B1 jars. First, of course  
there were changes. But even if there was no changes, maven creates  
some metadata files with timestamps in the jars, so just rebuilding a  
jar from the same codebase would result in a different checksum.

Andrus

[Tore Halset]

+1

On Nov 3, 2009, at 21:17 , Andrus Adamchik wrote:

> Just posted fresh artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0B1/
>
> Please cast your votes.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrus
>

[Andrey Razumovsky]

+1

2009/11/6 Tore Halset <[hidden email]>

> +1
>
>
> On Nov 3, 2009, at 21:17 , Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>  Just posted fresh artifacts:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0B1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eaadamchik/release/3.0B1/>
>>
>> Please cast your votes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>

--
Andrey

[Aristedes Maniatis-2]

On 6/11/09 7:22 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> No, MD5s should not match the first round of B1 jars. First, of course
> there were changes. But even if there was no changes, maven creates some
> metadata files with timestamps in the jars, so just rebuilding a
> jar from the same codebase would result in a different checksum.

OK. Looks like our firewall was caching the download since the URL was the same. I've got different jars now, and everything is working fine against our tests.

+1

Ari

--

-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A

[Michael Gentry-2]

I'm looking ... still testing a few things, but it is looking good so
far.  I'll report back later in the day (my time, at least).

Thanks!


On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Andrus Adamchik <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Guys, I know it may be too much trouble to evaluate two releases in a row,
> but can we take a look at the new artifacts please?
>
> Thanks,
> Andrus
>
> P.S. Here is my +1
>
>
>
> On Nov 3, 2009, at 10:17 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>> Just posted fresh artifacts:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0B1/
>>
>> Please cast your votes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andrus
>>
>
>

[Kevin Menard-4]

I got so far as building it and running hsqldb tests without problems.
 I'm looking to test with MySQL, Derby, & PostgreSQL either tonight or
tomorrow (weekends work a bit better for me).

Did we do the full gamut of DB testing this go around?  In the past
those results are normally reported by list members.

--
Kevin



On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Andrus Adamchik <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Guys, I know it may be too much trouble to evaluate two releases in a row,
> but can we take a look at the new artifacts please?
>
> Thanks,
> Andrus
>
> P.S. Here is my +1
>
>
>
> On Nov 3, 2009, at 10:17 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>> Just posted fresh artifacts:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0B1/
>>
>> Please cast your votes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andrus
>>
>
>

[Ольга Ткачева]

I running tests. All tests worked as in last Beta, except one test - *
testSelectLikeIgnoreCaseClob(org.apache.cayenne.query.SelectQueryTest).*
It failed on db2, sybase and sqlite. We did this test for
*CAY-1067<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAY-1067>
* (likeIgnoreCase is not supported for CLOBs in MS SQL adapter)

All list:

Oracle, postgres, h2 - successful

*h2 (2 *Failed tests: and 1 error test)

   - test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetPrimaryKeyToDbTest)

   - testLoad(org.apache.cayenne.access.DbLoaderTest)

 Tests in error:

  - testSelectLikeIgnoreCaseClob(org.apache.cayenne.query.SelectQueryTest)
-- NEW


 *Sybase (1 *Test in error:)
   - testSelectLikeIgnoreCaseClob(org.apache.cayenne.query.SelectQueryTest)
-- NEW


mysql (2 Tests in error: )

   - test1MBClob(org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContextClobTest)

   - test1MBBlob(org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContextBlobTest)


  Derby (2 Tests in error: )

   -
testDifferentEntity(org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContextEJBQLSubqueryTest)

   - testExists(org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContextEJBQLSubqueryTest)


  DB2(2 Failed tests:)

   - test(org.apache.cayenne.merge.SetPrimaryKeyToDbTest)

   - testLoad(org.apache.cayenne.access.DbLoaderTest)


  SQLserver (1 Failed test:)

  - testFetchLimitWithOffset(org.apache.cayenne.query.SelectQueryTest)



 2009/11/6 Kevin Menard <[hidden email]>

> I got so far as building it and running hsqldb tests without problems.
>  I'm looking to test with MySQL, Derby, & PostgreSQL either tonight or
> tomorrow (weekends work a bit better for me).
>
> Did we do the full gamut of DB testing this go around?  In the past
> those results are normally reported by list members.
>
> --
> Kevin
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Andrus Adamchik <[hidden email]>
> wrote:
> > Guys, I know it may be too much trouble to evaluate two releases in a
> row,
> > but can we take a look at the new artifacts please?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Andrus
> >
> > P.S. Here is my +1
> >
> >
> >
> > On Nov 3, 2009, at 10:17 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> >
> >> Just posted fresh artifacts:
> >>
> >> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0B1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eaadamchik/release/3.0B1/>
> >>
> >> Please cast your votes.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Andrus
> >>
> >
> >
>

--
Olga

[Robert Zeigler-6]

Dropped the binary into my projects and tried them out.
Looks good, for the most part.  I'm still getting the annoying  
behavior of valid EJBQLQueries failing validation on project save, but  
I wouldn't let that hold up the B1 release.

+1

Robert

On Nov 6, 2009, at 11/61:57 AM , Andrus Adamchik wrote:

> Guys, I know it may be too much trouble to evaluate two releases in  
> a row, but can we take a look at the new artifacts please?
>
> Thanks,
> Andrus
>
> P.S. Here is my +1
>
>
>
> On Nov 3, 2009, at 10:17 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>
>> Just posted fresh artifacts:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0B1/
>>
>> Please cast your votes.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andrus
>>
>

[Michael Gentry-2]

Everything is working for me so far, so +1.

Thanks!


On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Michael Gentry <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I'm looking ... still testing a few things, but it is looking good so
> far.  I'll report back later in the day (my time, at least).
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Andrus Adamchik <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Guys, I know it may be too much trouble to evaluate two releases in a row,
>> but can we take a look at the new artifacts please?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andrus
>>
>> P.S. Here is my +1
>>
>>
>>
>> On Nov 3, 2009, at 10:17 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>
>>> Just posted fresh artifacts:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0B1/
>>>
>>> Please cast your votes.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>
>>
>

[Malcolm Edgar-2]

+1   everything working for me.

regards Malcolm Edgar

On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 7:58 AM, Michael Gentry <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Everything is working for me so far, so +1.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Michael Gentry <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> I'm looking ... still testing a few things, but it is looking good so
>> far.  I'll report back later in the day (my time, at least).
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Andrus Adamchik <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> Guys, I know it may be too much trouble to evaluate two releases in a row,
>>> but can we take a look at the new artifacts please?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>> P.S. Here is my +1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Nov 3, 2009, at 10:17 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>
>>>> Just posted fresh artifacts:
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0B1/
>>>>
>>>> Please cast your votes.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Andrus
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

[Kevin Menard-4]

Okay, here are my test results:

HSQLDB:

No failures.

MySQL (5.1.38):

Failed tests:
  testSnapshotEvictedAndObjectsHollowedForInvalidate(org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContextSharedCacheTest)

  This was the same test failure I was seeing with HSQLDB before
Andrey added the sleep patch.

PostgreSQL:

Failed tests:
  testSnapshotEvictedAndObjectsHollowedForInvalidate(org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContextSharedCacheTest)

  This was the same test failure I was seeing with HSQLDB before
Andrey added the sleep patch.

Derby:

Tests in error:
  testDifferentEntity(org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContextEJBQLSubqueryTest)
  testExists(org.apache.cayenne.access.DataContextEJBQLSubqueryTest)


Dropping the JAR into a couple of my apps seems fine, but I'd like to
work out this shared cache test failure for the 3.0 stable branch.

But, I'm +1 for the release.

--
Kevin



On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Kevin Menard <[hidden email]> wrote:

> I got so far as building it and running hsqldb tests without problems.
>  I'm looking to test with MySQL, Derby, & PostgreSQL either tonight or
> tomorrow (weekends work a bit better for me).
>
> Did we do the full gamut of DB testing this go around?  In the past
> those results are normally reported by list members.
>
> --
> Kevin
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Andrus Adamchik <[hidden email]> wrote:
>> Guys, I know it may be too much trouble to evaluate two releases in a row,
>> but can we take a look at the new artifacts please?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Andrus
>>
>> P.S. Here is my +1
>>
>>
>>
>> On Nov 3, 2009, at 10:17 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>
>>> Just posted fresh artifacts:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0B1/
>>>
>>> Please cast your votes.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>
>>
>

[Andrus Adamchik]

Ok, the vote has been running for almost 6 days. Thanks everybody for  
taking time to evaluate it for the second time. Here is the tally:

Andrus Adamchik +1
Tore Halset +1
Andrey Razumovsky +1
Aristedes Maniatis +1
Robert Zeigler +1
Michael Gentry +1
Malcolm Edgar +1
Kevin Menard +1

So the release is officially approved. I am going to post the  
artifacts and update the download page.

I assume Ari will do the announcements. (BTW, is the confluence  
autoexport template problem solved, as we'll need to update the  
release status in the site menu?).

Thanks,
Andrus


On Nov 3, 2009, at 10:17 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:

> Just posted fresh artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.0B1/
>
> Please cast your votes.
>
> Thanks,
> Andrus
>

[Aristedes Maniatis-2]

On 9/11/09 7:24 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> I assume Ari will do the announcements. (BTW, is the confluence
> autoexport template problem solved, as we'll need to update the
> release status in the site menu?).

Yes. It is updating again, although the problem with the wiki link still remains. I'll send an announcement as soon as I see your changes to the download page.

Ari

--

-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C  5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A